On Memorial Day, we see parades and flag
ceremonies at monuments and maybe some politician will offer remarks from a VA
Hospital, but there are other sites we should notice and honor this Memorial
Day. They are the psychiatric hospitals, treatment centers and soup kitchens.
These too are places where American veterans live with the injuries of war.
There is a long history of the kinds of injuries seen in those less holy
places, as there is a long history of military mental illness.
On April 6th 1917 the US Congress declared war
and we entered WWI. It was our first full-scale entry into armed conflict on
European soil. War has changed since then and we have changed but there is one
constant, which is the sad fact of psychological injuries sustained by soldiers
in war.
Various authorities—military and psychiatric—put the
estimate of “stress casualties” between 25 and 60 percent, though the words we
use to describe them has changed over time. Terms have included: Battle
fatigue, war neurosis, shell shock, military hysteria, trench suicide and “LMF” or “lacking moral fiber”. These labels
reflect the cultural attitudes of each time period, but they are also
influenced by military strategy and even demographics.
In 1917 the US population was at an all-time high. In supply
terms this meant there were plenty of soldiers. In that war, where supply met
demand, it was not uncommon to find that those who broke down, who froze on the
field, who hesitated to shoot, retreated or exhibited any other detrimental
behavior were considered to have problems of character rather than injuries.
By contrast in World War II, with fighting in both Europe
and Asia putting more than 16 million Americans in uniform, the condition of a
struggling soldier was framed very differently. War trauma became an illness
which could be treated or cured.
But beyond the words we use, it’s important to note that
there has always been a civilian hand-me-down from the military and the psychiatric
casualties of war. The need to keep soldiers on the battlefield or to return
them to combat in World War II saw one of the United State’s largest
investments in psychology and psychiatry. Through the 1940’s the Pentagon spent
millions of dollars for psychological research. That has had a lasting impact
on all of our lives.
The research for that war’s soldiers spilled over and into
the fields of advertising, education and even design. 1946 saw the first
National Mental Health Act; in 1948 The Snake Pit –a movie about shock
treatment and psychoanalysis won 7 Academy Awards, and also that year Psychology
Today magazine was launched for the general public. In 1949, the Nobel Prize
for medicine went to Dr. Egas Moniz, who “invented” the pre-frontal lobotomy.
Today our casual talk of “issues” and “processing feelings” has its roots in
the Pentagon’s need.
More than any other war Viet Nam redefined our beliefs about mental
health. Five years after the fall of
Saigon, “Viet Nam Syndrome” was identified, which morphed into Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder, which rapidly generalized to civilians who suffered trauma.
Now, we are trying to end another war. Our soldiers face
guerilla combat plus suicide bombers and
armed civilians. These increase the psychological difficulties, and we are now
seeing another reframing of the resulting psychiatric casualties.
For now, we must remember to factor in these injuries when
we talk about the cost of war. We must
ask how we will label our broken soldiers, how we will care for them—and
their families-- and what will be changed, now and later.
No comments:
Post a Comment